Skip to content

The Hardest Science

Sure I’ll reduce my paid hours. How about the hours that my class meets?

Published on March 20, 2009 by Sanjay Srivastava

Or maybe you could just ease the tenure requirements a bit. Yeah, that’ll fly.

UO to ask faculty to take voluntary pay cuts

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Tags academia, snark, the economy

Post navigation

Previous Nick Kristof gets a B- social psych, and an incomplete in media studies
Next An epidemic of narcissism-ism?

Sanjay Srivastava

  • About the blog

Join 1,663 other subscribers

On Twitter

My Tweets

Search posts

Recent Posts

  • How many (and whose) lives would you bet on your theory?
  • Will this time be different?
  • This is your Brain on Psychology – This is your Psychology on Brain (a guest post by Rob Chavez)
  • Data analysis is thinking, data analysis is theorizing
  • What if we talked about p-hacking the way we talk about experimenter effects?
  • Accountable replications at Royal Society Open Science: A model for scientific publishing
  • The replication price-drop in social psychology
  • Reflections on SIPS (guest post by Neil Lewis, Jr.)
  • Improving Psychological Science at SIPS
  • Learning exactly the wrong lesson

Tags

academia academic freedom anprm association for research in personality band names big five brain causal inference citi cognitive biases cognitive dissonance comeuppance conference construct validity diversity economics education emotions ethics evolution evolutionary psychology framing funding graduate education grants greedy reductionism heuristics higher education hindsight human subjects incentives intelligence interpersonal perception intro to psych IRB journals kickbacks kids these days learning styles media mediation meta-science milgram moderation neuroscience null hypothesis significance testing open science p-hacking parenting personality personality psychology politics post-publication peer review power professional issues questionable research practices randomness replication research methods science journalism scientific misconduct scientific publishing selection effects sexism sips snark statistics stereotypes structural equation modeling teaching tenure textbooks the economy the sciences university of oregon

Archives

Blogroll

  • Absolutely Maybe
  • ARP Personality Meta-Blog
  • Åse Fixes Science
  • Bashir
  • BayesFactor
  • Brendan Nyhan
  • Cedar's Digest
  • Character & Context
  • citation needed
  • Cogtales
  • Cookie Scientist
  • Crystal Prison Zone
  • Daniel Lakens
  • Daniel Willingham
  • Data Colada
  • Dorothy Bishop
  • Felix Schönbrodt
  • Funderstorms
  • Genetics and Human Agency
  • Getting Better
  • Incurably Nuanced
  • Information Processing
  • Institutional Review Blog
  • Invariances
  • Lorne Campbell
  • My Scholarly Goop
  • NeuroChambers
  • Neurocritic
  • Neuroskeptic
  • Notes from Two Scientific Psychologists
  • Person X Situation
  • Peter McGraw's Blog
  • PIGEE
  • Prove Yourself Wrong
  • Rabble Rouser
  • Random Assignment
  • Retraction Watch
  • Rolf Zwaan
  • Russ Poldrack
  • Science of Psych
  • Sherman's Head
  • Social Science Evolving
  • sometimes i'm wrong
  • Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
  • The 100% CI
  • The Desk Reject
  • The Differential Biology Reader
  • The Etz Files
  • The Trait-State Continuum
  • Understanding Data
  • Will Gervais
  • Xenia Schmalz's blog
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • The Hardest Science
      • Join 1,663 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Hardest Science
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: